The Neuroscientific Study of the Self: Methodological and Theoretical Challenges

Cynthia J. Najdowski; E. Samuel Winer

Cynthia J. Najdowski
E. Samuel Winer

Abstract

Neuroscientific research methods, such as brain imaging techniques, have increasingly been applied to social cognitive research efforts and, in particular, to the study of the self. In this essay we discuss the ability of such research to shed light on the emergent, dynamic psychological phenomenon of self. Although neuroscientific tools can be useful for gaining general knowledge about associated underlying structures, a careful consideration of the methodological and theoretical issues discussed herein is necessary to avoid simplifying or reifying the self.

References

Baldwin, M.W., & Holmes, J.G. (1987). Salient private audiences and awareness of the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1087-1098.

Bandura, A.(2001).Social cognitive theory: Anagentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.

Beer, J.S. (2006). Orbitofrontal cortex and social regulation. In J. T. Cacioppo, P. S. Visser, & C. L. Pickett (Eds.), Social neuroscience: People thinking about thinking people (pp. 41-62). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Brunswick, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Cabeza, R., & Nyberg, L. (2000). Imaging cognition II: An empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 1-47.

Cervone, D. (2004). The architecture of personality. Psychological Review, 111, 183-204.

D’Argembeau, A., Comblain, C., & Van der Linden, M. (2005). Affective valence and the self-reference effect: Influence of retrieval conditions. British Journal of Psychology, 96, 457-466.

David, N., Bewernick, B.H., Cohen, M.X., Newen, A., Lux, S., Fink, G.R., et al. (2006). Neural representations of self versus other: Visual-spatial perspective taking and agency in a virtual ball-tossing game. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 898-910.

Feinberg, T.E (2001). Altered egos: How the brain creates the self. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Fransson, P. (2006). How default is the default mode of brain function? Further evidence from intrinsic BOLD signal fluctuations. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2836-2845.

Gusnard, D.A., Akbudak, E., Shulman, G.L., & Raichle, M.E. (2001). Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: Relation to a default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 4259-4264.

Gusnard, D.A., & Raichle, M. (2001). Searching for a baseline: Functional imaging and the resting human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 685-694.

Harré, R. (2002). Cognitive science: A philosophical introduction. London: Sage.

Hermans, H.J. M., & Dimaggio, G. (2007). Self, identity, and globalization in times of uncertainty: A dialogical analysis. Review of General Psychology, 11, 31-61.

Hume, D. (1748). A treatise of human nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Johnson, S.C., Baxter, L.C., Wilder, L.S., Pipe, J.G., Heiserman, J.E., & Prigatano, G.P. (2002). Neural correlates of self-reflection. Brain, 125, 1808-1814.

Kagan, J. (2007). The power of context. In G. Downey, Y. Shoda, & D. Cervone (Eds.), Toward a science of the per- son: A festschrift for Walter Mischel. New York: Guilford.

Kelley, W.M., Macrae, C.N., Wyland, C.I., Caglar, S., Inati, S., & Heatherton, T.F. (2002). Finding the self? Anevent related fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 785-794.

Kuiper, N.A., & MacDonald, M.R. (1982). Self and other perception in mild depressives. Social Cognition, 1, 223-239.

Lieberman, M.D., Jarcho, J.M., & Satpute, A.B. (2004). Evidence-based and intuition-based self-knowledge: An fMRI study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 421-435.

Macrae, C.N., Moran, J.M, Heatheron, T.F., Banfield, J.F., & Kelley, W.M. (2004). Medial prefrontal activity predicts memory for self. Cerebral Cortex 14, 647-654.

Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299-337.

Miller, M.B., Van Horn, J.D., Wolford, G.L., Handy, T.C., Valsangkar-Smyth, M., Inati, S., et al. (2002). Extensive individual differences in brain activations associated with episodic retrieval are reliable over time. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1200-1214.

Mitchell, J.P., Banaji, M.R., & Macrae, C.N. (2005). The link between social cognition and self-referential thought in the medial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1306-1315.

Moran, J.M., Macrae, C.N., Heatherton, T.F., Wyland, C.L., & Kelley, W.M. (2006). Neuroanatomical evidence for distinct cognitive and affective components of self. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1586-1594.

Norris, C.J., Chen, E.E., Zhu, D.C., Small, S.L., & Ca- cioppo, J.T. (2004). The interaction of social and emotional processes in the brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1818-1829.

Perrin, F., Maquet, P., Peigneux, P., Ruby, P., Degueldre, C., Balteau, E., et al. (2005). Neural mechanisms involved in the detection of our first name: A combined ERPs and PET study. Neuropsychologia, 43, 12-19.

Platek, S.M., Keenan, J.P., Gallup, Jr., G.G., & Mohamed, F.B. (2004). Where am I? The neurological correlates of self and other. Cognitive Brain Research, 19, 114-122.

Schilbach, L., Wohlschlaeger, A.M., Kraemer, N.C., Newen, A., Shah, N.J., Fink, G.R., et al. (2006). Being with virtual others: Neural correlates of social inter- action. Neuropsychologia, 44, 718-730.

Schmitz, T.W., Rowley, H.A., Kawahara, T.N., & John- son, S.C. (2006). Neural correlates of self-evaluative accuracy after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia, 44, 762-773.

Sherer, M., Hart, T., Whyte, J., Nick, T.G., & Yablon, S.A. (2005). Neuroanatomic basis of impaired self-awareness after traumatic brain injury: Findings from early computed tomography. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 20, 287-300.

Stark,C., & Squire,L. (2001). Whenzeroisnotzero:The problem of ambiguous baseline conditions in fMRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 12760-12765.

Travis, F. (2006). From I to I: Concepts of self on an object-referral/self-referral continuum. In A. P. Prescott (Ed.), The concept of self in psychology (pp. 21-43). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.

Uttal, W.R. (2002). Functional brain mapping—What is it good for? Plenty, but not everything! (Reply to Malcolm J. Avison). Brain and Mind, 3, 375–379.

van Duijn, M., & Bem, S. (2005). On the alleged illusion of conscious will. Philosophical Psychology, 18, 699-714.

Wheeler, S. C., DeMarree, K. G., & Petty, R. E. (2007). Understanding the role of the self in prime-to-behavior effects: The active-self account. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 234-261.